Oregon Supreme Court· 5/26/2016

Conroy v. Rosenblum

Citations

359 Or. 601
380 P.3d 299
2016 Ore. LEXIS 327
206 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining how use of \might\ in a summary to describe a certain effect was inaccurate and required modification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Conroy v. Rosenblum
Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-26
Parrish v. Ellen Rosenblum
Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-10-25

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Nesbitt v. Myers
Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-06-24· cited 11×
Conroy v. Rosenblum
Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-03-24· cited 9×
Hunnicutt v. Myers
Oregon Supreme Court· 2007-11-08· cited 7×
Girod v. Kroger
Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-12-08· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.