Skip to main content

Hull v. State

Citations

  • 462 S.E.2d 596
  • 265 Ga. 757

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ostensible notes between defendant and the victim “were properly authenticated by the introduction of other writings for comparison by the jury and by circumstantial evidence” (emphasis supplied)
  • evidence of prior criminal conduct that is dissimilar to the crime for which an accused is being prosecuted is not subject to Uniform Superior Court Rule 31.1’s disclosure requirements, but nonetheless must be admitted for a proper purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham, Sears

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.