Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 12/3/1966
Hull-Dobbs, Inc. v. Mallicoat
Citations
- 415 S.W.2d 344
- 57 Tenn. App. 100
- 1966 Tenn. App. LEXIS 201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that words “accepted in its present condition” are not synonymous with “as is,” “with all faults,” and similar expressions that call a buyer’s attention to the exclusion of warranties under § 47-2-316
- concluding that “as is” and “in present condition” are not synonymous phrases
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moamis, Cooper, Parrott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Miller v. BadgleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-04· cited 75×
- Overland Bond & Investment Corp. v. HowardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1972-12-15· cited 68×
- Lecates v. Hertrich Pontiac Buick Co.Superior Court of Delaware· 1986-04-24· cited 28×
- Board of Directors v. Southwestern Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1988-01-14· cited 21×
- Zwierzycki v. OwensWyoming Supreme Court· 1972-07-24· cited 12×
- Jordan v. Doonan Truck & Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-07-23· cited 11×
- Weaver v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In re McFarland)E.D. Tennessee· 1990-02-12· cited 7×
- Telerent Leasing Corp. v. Pacific Eastern Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1979-10-26· cited 2×
- Bruce A. Ungerleider v. Robert P. GordonEleventh Circuit· 2000-06-13
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.