Court of Appeals of Texas· 3/30/1993
Hughes v. State
Citations
- 850 S.W.2d 260
- 1993 WL 92267
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that without a showing of falsity, evidence of a prior accusation does not show an interest, bias, or motive to be untruthful and is not a proper subject for cross-examination or impeachment
- reasoning that without a showing of falsity, evidence of a prior accusation does not show an interest, bias, or motive to be untruthful and is not a proper subject for cross-examination or impeachment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lattimore, Weaver, Hopkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Reyna v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-29· cited 776×
- Yarborough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-11· cited 90×
- Pierson, Leonard Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-04-09· cited 64×
- Lempar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2006-06-28· cited 46×
- Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1996-08-30· cited 44×
- LaPointe v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-06-08· cited 31×
- Tinlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-17· cited 31×
- Garcia v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2005-12-14· cited 27×
- Streff v. StateTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 1994-11-03· cited 18×
- Leonard Pierson, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2013-04-19· cited 18×
- Roy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-12-30· cited 17×
- Loredo v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-10-18· cited 15×
- Hermosillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-10-18· cited 14×
- Palmer v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-02-07· cited 13×
- Lopez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-01-29· cited 11×
- Yarborough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-01-12· cited 5×
- Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-09-14· cited 2×
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-30· cited 1×
- Leroy McDonald v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2015-05-18
- in the Matter of B.M.N.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-08-27
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 9,383×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 2,097×
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 1,327×
- Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1988-12-12· cited 592×
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court· 1949-12-05· cited 524×
- Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-15· cited 415×
- Keeton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-04-06· cited 298×
- Whitsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-09-19· cited 278×
- Vargas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-24· cited 235×
- Tennard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-30· cited 232×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-08· cited 229×
- Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-03-22· cited 200×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-12-05· cited 185×
- Forbes v. Holiday Corp. Savings & Retirement PlanSupreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 133×
- Evans v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-02-26· cited 99×
- Thomas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1984-04-12· cited 87×
- Parr v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-10-26· cited 78×
- Straughter v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1990-12-27· cited 46×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.