Skip to main content

Hughes v. State

Citations

  • 826 So. 2d 1070
  • 2002 WL 31174440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding Apprendi nonretroactive under pre-Teague test set forth in Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1199, 87 S. Ct. 1967 (1967), and Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618, 14 L. Ed. 2d 601, 85 S. Ct. 1731 (1965)
  • finding Apprendi nonretroactive under pre- Teague test set forth in Stovall v. Denno , 388 U.S. 293, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1199, 87 S. Ct. 1967 (1967), and Linkletter v. Walker , 381 U.S. 618, 14 L. Ed. 2d 601, 85 S. Ct. 1731 (1965)
  • Hughes’ conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal and mandate issued on December 29, 1999; Apprendi was issued on June 26, 2000; Hughes filed his postcon-viction motion under Rule 3.800(a) on March 7, 2001
  • certified question as to whether Apprendi applies retroactively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.