Hughes v. Hertz Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• seller's statement that vehicle was a \fine car\ was not a misrepresentation of material fact but a statement of opinion
• seller's statement that vehicle was a `fine car' was not a misrepresentation of material fact but a statement of opinion
• “This Court has held that statements of opinion amounting to sales talk, or ‘puffery,’ are not statements concerning a material fact upon which one has a right to act and, therefore, will not support a fraud claim.”
• same for statement that automobile was a “fine” car

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).