McGowan v. Chrysler Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the plaintiff “failed to present substantial evidence that [Chrysler] had a duty to disclose to him the problems with the Fifth Avenue line of cars” for similar reasons
• \A party must have knowledge of a fact in order to be liable for its suppression.\
• “A party must have knowledge of a fact in order to be Hable for its suppression.”
• statements made by automobile salesman that automobile was “top of the line” and “smooth riding” car were “puffing” rather than fraudulent misrepresentations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).