Hugas Corp. v. Veader

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a remand is appropriate when the Zoning Board has applied an inappropriate legal standard
• \trial justice erred in upholding the zoning board's utilization of the variance standard and in not remanding the case for reconsideration under the special-exception standard\
• \trial justice erred in upholding the zoning board's utilization of the variance standard and in not remanding the case for reconsideration under the special-exception standard\
• \trial justice erred in upholding the board's utilization of the variance standard and in not remanding the case for reconsideration under the special-exception standard\
• \trial justice erred in upholding the board's utilization of the variance standard and in not remanding the case for reconsideration *Page 3 under the special-exception standard.\
• trial court erred in upholding the zoning board's decision which incorrectly applied the standard for variance, when the special exception standard applied, and in failing to remand the case for reconsideration under the special exception standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).