101 Ocean Road Condominium v. Goodrich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that prejudice can result from amendment “adding substantial time and expense” to litigation
• agreeing with the district court’s finding that new counsel’s assertion of a new claim failed to show good cause even if “coupled with [ ] lack of prejudice to the non-movant”
• affirming denial of leave to amend where district court reasoned that mere inadvertence, even coupled with lack of prejudice to the non-movant, is insufficient to constitute good cause under Rule 16
• “Mere inadvertence is insufficient to constitute good cause under Rule 16, even if that inadvertence is coupled with lack of prejudice to the nonmovant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).