Huffman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allegation of 34 Thomas v. State, 753 S.W.2d 688, 692 (Tex. \Black Hat Bar\ was unnecessary but descriptive Crim. App. 1988) (allegation that owner did not of \licensed premises\ so once alleged, had to be give his \assent in fact\ was unnecessary but de- proved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Curry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-09-20· cited 1,894×
• Gollihar v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-05-16· cited 1,349×
• Ex Parte Bailey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-09· cited 49×
• H.R.A., Matter Of
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-17· cited 24×
• Krupa v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1988-03-30· cited 3×
• Christopher v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-07-31· cited 2×
• Matter of HRA
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1990-05-17