Huffman v. Monroe County Community School Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “contradictory references cloud the intent of [a] document” and “[c]onsequently, parol evidence may be utilized to determine the parties’ true intentions respecting [a] document’s application”
• “[C]ontradictory references cloud the intent of [a] document” and “[c]onsequently, parol evidence may be utilized to determine the parties’ true intentions respecting [a] document’s application[.]”
• “A release executed in exchange for proper consideration works to release only those parties to the agreement unless it is clear from the document that others are to be released as well.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).