Estate of Spry v. Greg & Ken, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a release of “any other person, firm, corporation charged or chargeable” barred dramshop claims against a tavern
• “[R]ef-ormations for mistakes are only available if they are mistakes of fact, not if they are mistakes of law.”
• general release that did not contain language limiting release to the parties, unambiguously released all possible defendants
• general release that did not contain language limiting release to the parties, unambiguously released all possible defendants
• \Language that releases `all' people is clear unless other terms in the instrument are contradictory.\
• “One standard rule of contract interpretation is that if the language of an instrument is unambiguous, the intent of the parties is to be determined by reviewing the language contained between the four corners of that instrument.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).