Huff v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even though the appellant’s original suspended sentence may have been improper, it was not reversible error because the appellant received the benefits of the improper sentence
• original sentence improper but not reversible because defendant already received the benefits of the improper sentence
• “[Although his original suspended sentence may have been improper ..., it is not reversible on this appeal because Appellant has already received the benefits of the improper sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gonzales v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-03· cited 12×
• Dupree v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-13· cited 9×
• State v. Ortiz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-02-08· cited 9×
• White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-23· cited 3×
• McCraney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-09-20
• Lightfoot v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-17

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Poore v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-22· cited 288×
• Gaskins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-12· cited 20×
• Warrington v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-15· cited 14×
• Bennett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-26· cited 1×