District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/9/2005
Huet v. Tromp
Citations
- 912 So. 2d 336
- 2005 WL 2175521
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Huets were entitled -8- to claim work product privilege despite previous waiver; waiver had been cured when the Huets struck the witnesses at issue from their witness list
- explaining that “a party may waive the work product privilege with respect to matters covered by an investigator’s anticipated testimony when a party elects to present the investigator as a witness”
- “An investigator employed by a party may not be required to produce the work-product of his or her investigations, except in unusual circumstances constituting compelling necessity for the discovery in order to reach the merits of the cause.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sharp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Amended September 30, 2015 Iowa Insurance Institute, Iowa Defense Counsel Association, Iowa Self-insurers' Association, Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, and Iowa Association of Business and Industry v. Core Group of the Iowa Association for Justice Christopher J. Godfrey, Workers' Compensation Commissioner, Division of...Supreme Court of Iowa· 2015-06-12· cited 101×
- Dade Truss Co. v. BeatyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-06· cited 8×
- Nevin v. Palm Beach County School Bd.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-25· cited 7×
- AVANTE VILLA AT JACKSONVILLE v. BreidertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-05· cited 5×
- Marion County v. KirkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-21· cited 3×
- Taylor v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CORPORATIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-28
- Unnamed caseSupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-06-12
- Marilyn Roseanne Hunt v. James LightfootDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-08
- OWNERS INSURANCE CO. v. JAMES A. ARMOUR, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE BAY SHORE RD TRUSTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-09-09
- Beck v. HollowayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-27
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-05-11· cited 258×
- Caufield v. CanteleSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-12-19· cited 120×
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. BoecherSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-22· cited 101×
- Dodson v. PersellSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-11-20· cited 87×
- Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1972-05-10· cited 79×
- Francisco v. Victoria Marine ShippingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-04-15· cited 68×
- American Motors Corp. v. EllisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-08-12· cited 51×
- Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Florida· 1952-11-14· cited 46×
- State v. RabinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-09-30· cited 42×
- Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Turtle Reef Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-08· cited 33×
- Alachua General Hosp., Inc. v. Zimmer USA, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-09-11· cited 24×
- Deal v. DealDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-06· cited 18×
- Sipes v. United StatesS.D. California· 1986-07-01· cited 17×
- 5500 North Corp. v. WillisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-09· cited 10×
- Federal Exp. Corp. v. CantwayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-21· cited 10×
- Wackenhut Corp. v. CRANT-HEISZ ENTERPRISESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-01· cited 10×
- National Enterprises, Inc. v. MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-08-28· cited 7×
- Gilmor Trading Corp. v. Lind Elec., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-12· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.