Huet v. Tromp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Huets were entitled -8- to claim work product privilege despite previous waiver; waiver had been cured when the Huets struck the witnesses at issue from their witness list
• explaining that “a party may waive the work product privilege with respect to matters covered by an investigator’s anticipated testimony when a party elects to present the investigator as a witness”
• “An investigator employed by a party may not be required to produce the work-product of his or her investigations, except in unusual circumstances constituting compelling necessity for the discovery in order to reach the merits of the cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).