State v. Rabin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \opinion\ work product is nearly absolutely privileged and therefore not subject to disclosure
• noting that “[c]ompelling disclosure of the attorney’s notes or memoranda of oral statements tends to reveal an attorney’s opinion work product”
• holding that “the attorney-client privilege belongs to the client alone”
• explaining that opinion work product, which includes the attorney’s theories concerning the case, “is absolutely, or nearly absolutely, privileged”
• noting an attorney has a significant privacy interest in non-disclosure of opinion work product
• oral statements in a pretrial interview between criminal defendant's former spouse and his defense counsel \constituted protected work product\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).