Skip to main content

Huerta v. State

Citations

  • 933 S.W.2d 648
  • 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 4213
  • 1996 WL 543424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a party waives a complaint that admission of evidence violates his constitutional right to confrontation by failing to object on that ground
  • injury considered protracted when officer was unable to return to work for several days
  • appellant must direct court to specific portion of record supporting complained--of error
  • appellant must direct court to specific portion of record supporting complained—of error
  • evidence sufficient to raise jury issue on protracted impairment of a bodily organ when the victim was hit and kicked in the groin, urinated blood as a result, and was unable to return to work as a police officer for several days

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chapa, Stone, Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.