Skip to main content

Hudson v. State

Citations

  • 112 S.W.3d 794
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 6665
  • 2003 WL 21782564

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding doctrine applies when similarities between the charged and extraneous offenses exist, because it is the improbability of a like result being repeated by chance that gives the extraneous offense probative weight
  • Evidence of use of knife in prior assault was admissible when defendant claimed he was delusional; defendant put his mental state at issue.
  • Evidence of use of knife in prior assault was admissible when defendant claimed he was delusional; defendant put his mental state at issue.
  • “It is well-settled that extraneous[-]offense and prior[-]bad[-]acts evidence is admissible to rebut a defensive theory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Seymore, Guzman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.