Hudson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the state must prove by a preponderance of evidence that an expert testifying about DNA statistical and population genetics analysis have sufficient knowledge of the database grounded in the study of authoritative sources

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gibson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 3×
• Allen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-08

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Darling v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-01-03· cited 134×
• Murray v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-17· cited 86×
• Fay v. Mincey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-27· cited 35×
• Hudson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-12· cited 10×
• Lomax v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-03-05· cited 3×