Supreme Court of Georgia· 3/2/1989
Huddleston v. State
Citations
- 376 S.E.2d 683
- 259 Ga. 45
- 1989 Ga. LEXIS 101
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[t]he relationship of attorney-client may be expressly created by written contract, or may be inferred from the conduct of the parties.”
- relationship of attorney-client may be expressly created by written contract, or may be inferred from the conduct of the parties
- “The relationship of attorney-client may be expressly created by written contract, or may be inferred from the conduct of the parties.”
- relationship of attorney-client may be expressly created by written contract, or may be inferred from the conduct of the parties
- relationship of attorney-client may be expressly created by written contract, or may be inferred from the conduct of the parties
- relationship of attorney-client may be expressly created by written contract, or may be inferred from the conduct of the parties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Breuer-Harrison, Inc. v. CombeCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1990-09-24· cited 29×
- Abdulla v. KlosinskiS.D. Georgia· 2012-09-25· cited 22×
- Moody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-11-20· cited 20×
- Legacy Homes, Inc. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-07-15· cited 17×
- Newberry v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-15· cited 16×
- Mays v. AskinCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2003-07-16· cited 12×
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BAILEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 2023-04-04· cited 12×
- Spence v. HammCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-04-18· cited 8×
- Garrett v. Fleet Finance, Inc. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-10-15· cited 7×
- Tante v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-11-02· cited 6×
- Horn v. Smith & Meroney, P.C.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-01-08· cited 6×
- In Re Infocure Securities LitigationN.D. Georgia· 2002-07-17· cited 6×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-08-10· cited 4×
- Presidential Financial v. Raynard (In Re Raynard)N.D. Georgia· 1994-04-29· cited 3×
- Prudential Securities Credit Corp. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. (In re Apponline.Com, Inc.)E.D. New York· 2002-10-15· cited 1×
- Hafner v. Infocure Corp.N.D. Georgia· 2002-07-17· cited 1×
- David R. Samnick v. Yaacova I. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-04-03
- MORGAN & MORGAN JACKSONVILLE, PLLC v. BRIAN BROWNCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-10-31
- ROYAL TEXAS, LLC v. CAJUN GLOBAL, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-09-10
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Gibbons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-02-03· cited 353×
- Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia· 1887-07-05· cited 201×
- Guillebeau v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-03-09· cited 48×
- Crawford W. Long Memorial Hospital of Emory University v. YerbySupreme Court of Georgia· 1988-11-30· cited 39×
- Simmerson v. BlanksCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-03-08· cited 30×
- Summerlin v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-09-09· cited 27×
- Davenport v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-02-10· cited 19×
- Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-10-08· cited 14×
- Parrish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1953-10-15· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.