· 2/8/2002
Kathryn Cheshire v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Citations
- 282 F.3d 326
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2012
- 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing innocent spouse relief under § 6015(c) for clear error by the Tax Court and § 6015(f) for abuse of discretion by the Secretary
- reviewing innocent 32 WILSON V . CIR spouse relief under § 6015(c) for clear error by the Tax Court and § 6015(f) for abuse of discretion by the Secretary
- “Unless the text of a statute is ambiguous on its face, this court adheres to that statute’s plain 8 Nos. 11-60549 & 11-60706 meaning.”
- “Unless the text of a statute is ambiguous on its face, this court adheres to that statute’s plain 8 Nos. 11-60549 & 11-60706 meaning.”
- “Unless the text of a statute is ambiguous on its face, this court adheres to that statute’s plain meaning.”
- “Unless the text of a statute is ambiguous on its face, this court adheres to that statute’s plain meaning.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Davis, Vance
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.