Skip to main content
· 2/8/2002

Kathryn Cheshire v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 282 F.3d 326
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2012
  • 27 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing innocent spouse relief under § 6015(c) for clear error by the Tax Court and § 6015(f) for abuse of discretion by the Secretary
  • reviewing innocent 32 WILSON V . CIR spouse relief under § 6015(c) for clear error by the Tax Court and § 6015(f) for abuse of discretion by the Secretary
  • “Unless the text of a statute is ambiguous on its face, this court adheres to that statute’s plain 8 Nos. 11-60549 & 11-60706 meaning.”
  • “Unless the text of a statute is ambiguous on its face, this court adheres to that statute’s plain 8 Nos. 11-60549 & 11-60706 meaning.”
  • “Unless the text of a statute is ambiguous on its face, this court adheres to that statute’s plain meaning.”
  • “Unless the text of a statute is ambiguous on its face, this court adheres to that statute’s plain meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Davis, Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.