M.D. Pennsylvania· 2/9/2004
Howard v. Mendez
Citations
- 304 F. Supp. 2d 632
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2241
- 2004 WL 305596
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that \common sense requires tolling of the limitations period when a litigant's right to file suit depends on the timely conduct of the opposing party's agent in assisting in the exhaustion of mandatory administrative remedies\
- concluding that “common sense requires tolling of the limitations period when a litigant’s right to file suit depends on the timely conduct of the opposing party’s agent in assisting in the exhaustion of mandatory administrative remedies”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caldwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 6,563×
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,581×
- Sameric Corporation Of Delaware, Inc. v. City Of PhiladelphiaThird Circuit· 1998-04-10· cited 660×
- Harris v. HegmannFifth Circuit· 1999-12-08· cited 487×
- Ronald Jones v. Willis Morton, Warden of Trenton State Prison Attorney General of the State of New JerseyThird Circuit· 1999-10-25· cited 425×
- Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-10-21· cited 281×
- Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp.Third Circuit· 1991-07-08· cited 228×
- Shaun R. Johnson v. Officer Ruben Rivera, Officer Matthew Martinez, Officer Geoffrey Howard, and Officer William PellegriniSeventh Circuit· 2001-11-29· cited 199×
- Roger Anthony Brown v. James Morgan, Warden James B. Mitchell Doug SappSixth Circuit· 2000-04-07· cited 185×
- Dalrymple v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-11· cited 149×
- Molineux v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-10-15· cited 111×
- Wright v. HollingsworthFifth Circuit· 2000-02-10· cited 86×
- Clifford v. GibbsFifth Circuit· 2002-08-01· cited 78×
- Robbins & Seventko Orthopedic Surgeons, Inc. v. GeisenbergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-26· cited 30×
- Anderson v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Third Circuit· 2002-07-23· cited 27×
- Saylor v. RidgeE.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-01-08· cited 24×
- Egervary v. YoungE.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-09-06· cited 10×
- Swierkowski v. Consolidated Rail Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-04-03· cited 5×
- Simmons v. SniderCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-06-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.