Houston v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although the court ruled that the introduction of photographs clearly identifiable as mug shots, showing a date prior to the date of the crimes charged, constituted reversible error, the court stated that if such photographs are properly cropped, such error could be cured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• D'ANNA v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-18· cited 11×
• Taylor v. State
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1983-01-05· cited 9×
• Duncan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-13· cited 8×
• Fuster v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-12-17· cited 4×
• Betsy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-03-13· cited 3×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-19· cited 3×
• Lewis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-01-18

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1968-02-20· cited 442×
• Robert E. Barnes v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1966-05-27· cited 110×
• United States v. Charles A. Harrington
  Second Circuit· 1973-12-28· cited 106×
• State v. Rucker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-04-07· cited 14×
• Mancebo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-09-27· cited 13×
• Abreau v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-07-06· cited 8×