Skip to main content

Houston v. State

Citations

  • 852 So. 2d 425
  • 2003 WL 21990412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that appointing an expert and specifying the duration of treatment are “mandatory requirements” of the chemical castration statute
  • explaining that appointing an expert and specifying the duration of treatment are “mandatory requirements” of the chemical castration statute
  • explaining that appointing an expert and specifying the duration of treatment are “mandatory requirements” of the chemical castration statute
  • reversing portion of sentence requiring MPA treatment, where trial court failed to comply with mandatory provisions of section 794.0235 relating to appointment of medical expert and specification of duration of treatment
  • \Similar fact evidence relevant to prove a material fact other than identity need not meet the rigid similarity requirement applied when such evidence is used to prove identity.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Monaco

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.