District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 5/4/1988
Horton v. United States
Citations
- 541 A.2d 604
- 1988 D.C. App. LEXIS 65
- 1988 WL 41754
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding right to unanimous verdict “so clearly prejudiced by the confusion inherent in the separate defenses to the alleged gunshots, unaided by a special unanimity instruction, that plain error occurred” (citations omitted)
- a unanimity instruction was required where multiple factual scenarios may have been deduced from the evidence depending upon which, if any, of the defendant’s defenses the jury may have chosen to accept
- “[T]here is no evidence to which we can point that indicates unanimous agreement among the jurors; we cannot deduce from the record whether the jury must have agreed upon one particular set of facts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ferren, Belson, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.