Skip to main content

Citations

  • 2009 OK CR 7
  • 204 P.3d 777
  • 2009 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 9
  • 2009 WL 567052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding essential requirements of due process are notice and opportunity to be heard
  • recognizing admissibility of sexual propensity evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumpkin, Lewis, Johnson, Chapel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.