Skip to main content

Hopper v. State

Citations

  • 483 S.W.3d 235
  • 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 457
  • 2016 WL 299766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that most types of complaints are forfeited by the failure to present a timely, specific objection, request, or motion to the trial court for a ruling
  • stating that most types of complaints are forfeited by the failure to present a timely, specific objection, request, or motion to the trial court for a ruling
  • considering testimony that object had potential to cause death or serious bodily injury in totality of circumstances review
  • considering threats and words used in determining whether object used as a deadly weapon
  • “Based on the rational inferences the jury could have drawn from the admitted evidence, the evidence is sufficient to show that Hopper used his hands in a manner that was capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.”
  • “Based on the rational inferences the jury could have drawn from the admitted evidence, the evidence is sufficient to show that Hopper used his hands in a manner that was capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dauphinot, Gabriel, Sudderth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.