Skip to main content

Hopkins v. Powers

Citations

  • 497 N.E.2d 757
  • 113 Ill. 2d 206
  • 100 Ill. Dec. 579
  • 1986 Ill. LEXIS 294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • liability imposed under dramshop act was “sui generis and exclusive” and therefore nontortious for purposes of contribution among joint tortfeasors statute
  • \[the] limitation on the class of plaintiffs under the Dramshop Act has been referred to as the innocent-suitor concept and has been applied to deny recovery to injured third persons who are guilty of complicity in the intoxication of the individual directly causing their injuries\
  • “[the] limitation on the class of plaintiffs under the Dramshop Act has been referred to as the innocent-suitor concept and has been applied to deny recovery to injured third persons who are guilty of complicity in the intoxication of the individual directly causing their injuries”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goldenhersh, Moran, Simon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hopkins v. Powers

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.