Nelson v. Araiza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In many cases this will be an issue of fact under the given circumstances. In other cases whether there is sufficient evidence to support the doctrine ... will be for judicial determination”
• “[a]ssertions that one who provokes an attack is barred by complicity [citations] are incompatible with the doctrine. Complicity is not predicated on the plaintiff’s contribution to his injury but only upon his contribution to the inebriate’s -5- intoxication.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).