Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/22/1974
Hopkins v. Blanco
Citations
- 457 Pa. 90
- 320 A.2d 139
- 1974 Pa. LEXIS 820
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Equal Rights Amendment requires that wife as well as husband be permitted to recover for loss of consortium.
- holding that the Equal Rights Amendment requires that wife as well as husband be permitted to recover for loss of consortium.
- holding that the right to recover for loss of consortium extended to wives, replacing the previous rule that only husbands were entitled to pursue such a cause of action
- holding, under Equal Rights Amendment, that wife should be allowed to recover for loss of consortium
- holding that because a husband had a right to recover for loss of consortium as a result of a tortious injury to his wife, the Equal Rights Amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution, Pa. Const. Art. I, § 28, requires that a wife be allowed to recover for such a loss as well
- extending to married women the right to claim damages for loss of consortium
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brien, Eagen, Eoberts, Ino, Jones, Mander, Nix, Pomeroy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hopson v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-01-23· cited 250×
- Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-06· cited 222×
- Singer v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-06-26· cited 206×
- American Export Lines, Inc. v. AlvezSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 193×
- Tiernan v. DevoeThird Circuit· 1991-01-17· cited 167×
- Weaver v. HarpsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-07-20· cited 127×
- Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-06· cited 116×
- Fischer v. Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-05· cited 78×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2001-01-09· cited 77×
- DiFlorido v. DiFloridoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-01-27· cited 74×
- Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-03· cited 65×
- Sarah Anne Williams Wayne Williams, on Behalf of Their Minor Son, John Williams v. The School District of Bethlehem, PaThird Circuit· 1993-07-30· cited 62×
- Steiner by Steiner v. Bell Tele. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-18· cited 60×
- Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-30· cited 57×
- Darr Construction Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-21· cited 53×
- Lundgren v. Whitney's Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1980-07-31· cited 51×
- Jacoby v. BrinckerhoffSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-10· cited 47×
- Linebaugh v. LehrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-02-20· cited 37×
- Klein v. Council of Chemical AssociationsE.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-04-03· cited 35×
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Insurance Commissioner of CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-09-27· cited 35×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-26· cited 177×
- Neuberg v. BobowiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-06-30· cited 54×
- Hopkins v. BlancoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-27· cited 43×
- Link v. Highway Express Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-10-12· cited 13×
- Brown v. Glenside Lumber & Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-04-24· cited 10×
- Brown v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-20· cited 7×
Other cases named Hopkins v. Blanco
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.