Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that theories of actual malice “grounded on allegations of poor journalistic practices” such as “a preconceived story-line ... are without support in the case law”
• affirming district court’s finding of no actual malice in defamation claim based on the defendant’s misinterpretation of the plaintiffs Complaint because the jury could find no “more than [defendant’s] negligence in jumping to [a] conclusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).