Hooper v. Allstate Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding exclusion in homeowner’s policy for “ ‘intentional or criminal acts of an insured’ ” extended to all criminal acts, whether or not insured intended to commit act or to cause harm, and did not contravene public policy
• rejecting allegations that a criminal acts exclusion contravened public policy or was unconscionable after an insured committed second degree assault with a shotgun
• outlining the same exclusion in a similar fashion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).