Hooks v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of petitioner’s ability to run a continuing criminal enterprise was relevant to issue of mental retardation
• evidence of petitioner's ability to run a continuing criminal enterprise was relevant to issue of mental retardation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hooks v. Workman
  Tenth Circuit· 2012-08-03· cited 270×
• Howell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2006-06-29· cited 24×
• Lacy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2007-08-15· cited 4×
• Hooks v. Workman
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2010-02-26· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wainwright v. Witt
  Supreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
• Atkins v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 3,384×
• Mann v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 371×
• Hooks v. Ward
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-07-16· cited 246×
• Faust v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 1997-04-28· cited 157×
• Parker v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1996-04-23· cited 149×
• Hooks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1993-10-05· cited 118×
• Charm v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1996-08-22· cited 116×
• Douglas v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1997-12-17· cited 102×
• Murphy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2002-09-04· cited 89×
• Hooks v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-09-18· cited 54×
• Lambert v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2003-05-29· cited 44×
• Dodd v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2000-01-06· cited 33×
• Murphy v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2003-03-21· cited 29×
• Myers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2005-11-17· cited 27×