Sixth Circuit· 8/23/1985

Hooks v. Hooks

Citations

771 F.2d 935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that, “[i]n effect, plaintiff allege[d] the existence of two separate conspiracies” because actions were not part of a single plan
holding that a civil conspiracy to violate the plaintiff's civil rights cannot stand where the underlying civil rights claim is unsupported
recognizing that turning child over to someone who will abscond with the child outside of the jurisdiction of the court constitutes a de facto deprivation of post-deprivation remedy
finding opposing affidavit to satisfy the requirements of Rule 56 to the extent it was based on personal knowledge
affirming summary judgment on conspiracy claim that essentially alleged two separate plans by different groups
requiring a conspiracy plaintiff to demonstrate “a single plan, that the alleged coconspirator shared in the general conspiratorial objective, and that an overt act was committed in furtherance of the conspiracy that caused injury to the complainant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Circujt, Kennedy, Weick, Wellford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

160 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Hooks v. Hooks

7 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.