Bazzi v. City of Dearborn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that summary judgment is appropriate if “the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could [not] return a verdict for the plaintiff” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that mere “vague and conclusory allegations unsupported by material facts” are insufficient to withstand summary judgment on a civil-conspiracy claim
• recognizing that in order for a conspiracy to exist there must be a “general conspiratorial objective of violating [plaintiff]’s constitutional rights”
• explaining that a conspiracy claim can succeed without either express agreement or each conspirator’s knowledge of the conspiracy’s full scope
• “[A] vehicle stop by a police officer is a ‘seizure’ within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.”
• “[A] vehicle stop by a police officer is a ‘seizure’ within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).