Skip to main content
· 7/14/1925

Honomu Sugar Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 2 B.T.A. 347
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the corpus delicti rule to reverse the conviction of a defendant who confessed to forcing his three-year-old daughter to fondle his penis
  • reinstating the trial court's order dismissing the charge because the State failed to establish corpus delicti independent of the defendant's confession
  • \This court has infrequently discussed under what conditions it should disregard the doctrine of stare decisis and overturn an established rule of law.\
  • “This court has infrequently discussed under what conditions it should disregard the doctrine of stare decisis and overturn an established rule of law.”
  • “[C]orpus delecti is not established when independent evidence supports reasonable and logical inferences of both criminal agency and noncriminal cause.” (emphasis omitted and internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “It is sufficient if the independent evidence prima facie establishes the corpus delicti”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James, Littleton, Smith, Tetjssell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.