· 7/14/1925
Honomu Sugar Co. v. Commissioner
Citations
- 2 B.T.A. 347
- 1925 BTA LEXIS 2438
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the corpus delicti rule to reverse the conviction of a defendant who confessed to forcing his three-year-old daughter to fondle his penis
- reinstating the trial court's order dismissing the charge because the State failed to establish corpus delicti independent of the defendant's confession
- \This court has infrequently discussed under what conditions it should disregard the doctrine of stare decisis and overturn an established rule of law.\
- “This court has infrequently discussed under what conditions it should disregard the doctrine of stare decisis and overturn an established rule of law.”
- “[C]orpus delecti is not established when independent evidence supports reasonable and logical inferences of both criminal agency and noncriminal cause.” (emphasis omitted and internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- “It is sufficient if the independent evidence prima facie establishes the corpus delicti”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James, Littleton, Smith, Tetjssell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.