Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 4/13/1925

McCaughn v. Ludington

Citations

  • 268 U.S. 106
  • 45 S. Ct. 423
  • 69 L. Ed. 868
  • 1925 U.S. LEXIS 554
  • 1 C.B. 110
  • 5 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 5376
  • 1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Flannery held “that the Act allowed a deduction to the extent only that an actual loss was sustained from the investment, as measured by the difference between the purchase and sale prices of the property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sanford, McReynolds, Sutherland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named McCaughn v. Ludington

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.