Holtberg v. Bommersbach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding intent to return may be of “extreme importance” in determining place of abode

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United Bank of Loves Park v. Dohm
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-06-09· cited 18×
• Lundgren v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-05-11· cited 15×
• O'SELL v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-06-29· cited 11×
• A & S Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Wetzler
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1970-06-15· cited 4×
• Walker Employment Service, Inc. v. Swanson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-11-24· cited 3×
• Patterson v. Wu Family Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-06-15· cited 3×
• Rask v. American Federation of Labor
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1962-07-06· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn
  Supreme Court· 1951-04-09· cited 1,278×
• Berryhill v. Sepp
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1909-01-08· cited 36×
• Bechtel v. Bechtel
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1907-07-12· cited 35×
• Heffner v. Gunz
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1882-04-29· cited 25×
• Bausman v. Tilley
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1891-04-08· cited 15×
• Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. Norris
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-06-03· cited 14×
• Plummer v. Hatton
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1892-10-29· cited 13×
• Lee v. Macfee
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1890-12-04· cited 6×
• Willard v. Marr
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1913-02-21· cited 4×