Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/8/1909
Berryhill v. Sepp
Citations
- 106 Minn. 458
- 119 N.W. 404
- 1909 Minn. LEXIS 783
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that, in the context of service, “‘abode’ and ‘residence’ may be synonymous”
- “If, for example, a summons were in fact served on the wrong person, and that person handed it to the proper defendant, there would be no service.”
- \usual place of abode\ much more restricted term than \residence\
- “[Sjervice must accord strictly with statutory requirements.”
- \[S]ervice must accord strictly with statutory requirements.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jaggard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court· 1928-02-20· cited 437×
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court· 1996-08-01· cited 70×
- Bell Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HortonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-09· cited 35×
- Williams v. Capital Transit Co. Williams v. DouglasD.C. Circuit· 1954-06-24· cited 30×
- Mooney Aircraft, Inc. v. Dennis J. Donnelly, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph M. Donnelly, DeceasedFifth Circuit· 1968-11-08· cited 23×
- Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-10-11· cited 20×
- Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-08-31· cited 20×
- Lundgren v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-05-11· cited 15×
- Eckman v. GrearPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas· 1936-10-17· cited 15×
- Lovin v. HicksSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1911-12-08· cited 15×
- Francis v. KnerrSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-05-20· cited 15×
- Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-11-07· cited 12×
- Holtberg v. BommersbachSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-04-10· cited 10×
- Marriage of Peterson v. EishenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-03-25· cited 9×
- Ortiz v. Crescent Trading Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1949-01-21· cited 9×
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. VenticinqueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-06-16· cited 8×
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of GahnNew York Surrogate's Court· 1920-01-15· cited 8×
- Neher v. District Court for Fourth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1967-01-23· cited 7×
- Murray v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-04-11· cited 6×
- A & S Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. WetzlerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1970-06-15· cited 4×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Madison County Bank v. Suman's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri· 1883-10-15· cited 37×
- Bechtel v. BechtelSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1907-07-12· cited 35×
- Capehart v. CunninghamWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1878-04-27· cited 30×
- Mygatt v. CoeSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1899-06-12· cited 17×
- Bausman v. TilleySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1891-04-08· cited 15×
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1895-06-03· cited 14×
- D. M. Osborne & Co. v. StringhamSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1890-12-18· cited 13×
- Du Val v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1882-11-15· cited 12×
- Dunn's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1868-02-15· cited 12×
- Lee v. MacfeeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1890-12-04· cited 6×
- Kerwin v. SabinSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1892-07-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.