Holt v. Holt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that a material and substantial change in only one circumstance, the ability of the parent to contribute, is sufficient to justify modifying an order providing for the support of a child”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baucom v. Crews
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1991-11-06· cited 30×
• Farley v. Farley
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1987-06-02· cited 17×
• Laviage v. Laviage
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1983-02-24· cited 10×
• Smith v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-05-19· cited 1×
• in the Interest of W.B.B., a Child
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2018-07-17
• in the Interest of K.F., R.F., and T.F., Children
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2018-12-27

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moreland v. Moreland
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1979-10-26· cited 16×
• Bergerac v. Maloney
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1977-09-14· cited 16×
• Willis v. Willis
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1968-03-07· cited 12×
• Watkins v. Austin
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1979-11-29· cited 11×
• Cozby v. Cozby
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1980-03-27· cited 7×
• Carter v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1979-10-11· cited 2×