Carter v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no conflict between New Jersey and New York law with respect to unjust enrichment and that “plaintiffs” failure to allege specific loss or deprivation of opportunity to profit from [personal] information warranted dismissal of their [unjust enrichment] claim”
• “plaintiffs do not allege that PulsePoint’s data collection practices actually deprived them of any opportunity to sell their own personalized information”
• defendant’s unauthorized access and monitoring of plaintiffs’ web-browsing activity comprised injury-in-fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).