California Court of Appeal· 1/13/2011
Holmes v. Petrovich Development Co. LLC
Citations
- 191 Cal. App. 4th 1047
- 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 878
- 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 33
- 111 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that lack of actual monitoring was “immaterial”
- explaining that had the client emailed her attorney “us[ing] 27 her home computer to which some unknown persons involved in the delivery, facilitation, or 1 917(b)] unless [she] allowed others to have access to her e-mails and disclosed their content”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scotland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-05-01· cited 88×
- Wallace v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-02-25· cited 64×
- Adams v. MHC Colony Park Ltd. PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-03-10· cited 58×
- Kelley v. The Conco Cos.California Court of Appeal· 2011-06-06· cited 52×
- Meeks v. AutoZone, Inc.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-06-21· cited 32×
- Harb v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-01-23· cited 24×
- In re Information Management Services, Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2013-09-05· cited 13×
- Clean Energy Fuels Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-06-27· cited 11×
- Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-05-29
- Adams v. MHC Colony Park Ltd. PartnershipCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-12-03
- Wm. Jefferson & Co. v. Assessment Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal· 2014-07-22
- Larson v. UHS of Rancho SpringsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-10-03
- Meeks v. AutoZone, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2018-06-21
- Militello v. VFARM 1509California Court of Appeal· 2023-03-21
- Miller v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal· 2023-12-18
- McDoniel v. Kavry ManagementCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2025-09-30
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-03-22· cited 2,916×
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court· 1987-03-31· cited 1,069×
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court· 2005-08-11· cited 838×
- Patricia A. Brooks v. City of San Mateo, a Municipal Order and Corporation San Mateo Police Department John Stangl, Chief of Police Steven SelvaggioNinth Circuit· 2000-10-23· cited 746×
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-11-03· cited 666×
- Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-10-13· cited 542×
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1994-07-25· cited 419×
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1996-12-16· cited 321×
- Reichardt v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-02-06· cited 309×
- Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-08-14· cited 286×
- Lyle v. Warner Brothers Television ProductionsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 251×
- Ann M. Hostetler v. Quality Dining, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2000-06-29· cited 175×
- American Drug Stores, Inc. v. StrohCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-11-13· cited 108×
- Akers v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-02-08· cited 107×
- Mokler v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-11-26· cited 95×
- Howard v. Thrifty Drug & Discount StoresCalifornia Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 94×
- Jones v. Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-06-14· cited 89×
- McLaughlin v. McLaughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-07-18· cited 74×
- Carlton v. QuintCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-02-02· cited 66×
- Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2008-06-18· cited 55×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.