Hollis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming order summarily denying rule 3.800(a) motion; claim that state failed to serve notice of intent to habitualize required evidentiary hearing, thus, motion to correct allegedly illegal sentence could not be used to resolve issue of notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hastings v. Krischer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-02· cited 4×
• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-06· cited 2×
• Epps v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-14· cited 1×
• Wilcher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-22
• Perry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-07
• Acevedo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-18
• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-19

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mancino
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-06-11· cited 282×
• State v. Callaway
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 219×
• Ashley v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-02-25· cited 194×
• Judge v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-20· cited 145×
• Massey v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-12-03· cited 41×
• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-05-20· cited 26×
• Lewis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-27· cited 2×