Supreme Court of Delaware· 6/22/1993
Nixon v. Blackwell
Citations
- 626 A.2d 1366
- 1993 Del. LEXIS 270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that only the fairness of the process was important where the adoption of an ESOP was challenged by non-employee shareholders as providing increased liquidity solely for the ESOP holders
- explaining that there are no “special rules” or protections for minority stockholders of closely held corporations that are not statutory close corporations
- explaining that there are no “special rules” or protections for minority stockholders of closely held corporations that are not statutory close corporations
- explaining that the “doctrine of entire fairness does not lend itself to bright line precision or rigid doctrine”
- finding that majority shareholders owe no special fiduciary duties to minority shareholders
- applying entire fairness where the controlling stockholders used various transactions to generate benefits for themselves that were “beyond that which benefited other stockholders generally”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Horsey, Moore, Ridgely, Veasey, Walsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-01-18· cited 456×
- Kahn v. Lynch Communication Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-04-05· cited 299×
- Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-02-04· cited 265×
- Gantler v. StephensSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-01-27· cited 244×
- Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1995-07-17· cited 242×
- Unitrin, Inc. v. American General Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1995-01-11· cited 223×
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2005-08-09· cited 206×
- Scattered Corp. v. Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1997-10-22· cited 204×
- Harrison v. NetCentric Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-03-14· cited 183×
- Williams v. GeierSupreme Court of Delaware· 1996-01-23· cited 180×
- Americas Mining Corp. v. TheriaultSupreme Court of Delaware· 2012-08-27· cited 178×
- Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-11-28· cited 149×
- Schock v. NashSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-06-16· cited 127×
- In re Orchard Enterprises, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2014-02-28· cited 127×
- Reis v. Hazelett Strip-Casting Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2011-02-01· cited 126×
- Kahn v. Tremont Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1997-06-10· cited 122×
- Solomon v. ArmstrongCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1999-03-25· cited 109×
- Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1994-10-12· cited 93×
- Carlson v. HallinanCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2006-03-21· cited 86×
- eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. NewmarkCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2010-09-09· cited 86×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-01· cited 1,206×
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-02-01· cited 690×
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals· 1979-07-09· cited 638×
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1939-04-11· cited 466×
- Smith v. Van GorkomSupreme Court of Delaware· 1985-03-14· cited 428×
- Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-06-10· cited 322×
- Rosenblatt v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-05-09· cited 268×
- Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware· 1972-01-04· cited 265×
- Sinclair Oil Corporation v. LevienSupreme Court of Delaware· 1971-06-18· cited 258×
- Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-05-03· cited 245×
- Rabkin v. Philip A. Hunt Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-09-23· cited 141×
- Sonitrol Holding Co. v. Marceau InvestissementsSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-05-14· cited 83×
- Cheff v. MathesSupreme Court of Delaware· 1964-03-17· cited 83×
- Fiduciary Trust Co. v. Fiduciary Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1982-04-20· cited 70×
- Rothschild International Corp. v. Liggett Group Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-20· cited 52×
- AC Acquisitions Corp. v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1986-09-18· cited 49×
- Orzeck v. EnglehartSupreme Court of Delaware· 1963-11-05· cited 48×
- Providence & Worcester Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware· 1977-09-08· cited 33×
- Marciano v. NakashSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-12-23· cited 31×
- Shamrock Holdings, Inc. v. Polaroid Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1989-01-06· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.