Tenth Circuit· 1/29/2001
Hollins v. Delta Airlines
Citations
- 238 F.3d 1255
- 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 653
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1174
- 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,386
- 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1626
- 2001 WL 69042
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “several hangman’s nooses dangling from the ceiling above [the plaintiffs] work area” coupled with racist jokes, including one about lynching, were sufficient to give rise to an inference of a hostile environment
- concluding there was a genuine issue of material fact that the display of several hangman’s nooses, as well as racist jokes, were severe or pervasive enough conduct to constitute a hostile work environment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seymour, Murphy, Kane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- DeSpain v. UphoffTenth Circuit· 2001-07-10· cited 451×
- Lugo Montalvo v. Sol Meliá Vacation ClubSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2015-12-02· cited 163×
- Billie R. Banks v. General Motors, LLCSecond Circuit· 2023-09-07· cited 163×
- Tademy v. Union Pacific Corp.Tenth Circuit· 2008-04-01· cited 149×
- Schrader v. Fred A. Ray, M.D., P.C.Tenth Circuit· 2002-07-16· cited 56×
- Gerald v. LocksleyD. New Mexico· 2011-05-06· cited 25×
- Curry v. SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.E.D. Michigan· 2009-10-30· cited 20×
- United States v. DistefanoTenth Circuit· 2002-02-12· cited 16×
- Gerald v. LocksleyD. New Mexico· 2011-08-01· cited 12×
- McCafferty v. Preiss Enterprises, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2013-08-13· cited 10×
- Brown v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.S.D. New York· 2009-01-21· cited 5×
- Watson v. City of TopekaD. Kansas· 2002-12-27· cited 5×
- Schmidt v. Medicalodges, Inc.D. Kansas· 2007-06-27· cited 3×
- Benavides v. City of Oklahoma CityNinth Circuit· 2013-01-23· cited 3×
- Zapata Berríos v. J.F. Montalvo Cash & Carry, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2013-08-27· cited 3×
- Boswell v. JaspersonD. Utah· 2003-05-01· cited 1×
- Brown v. Millard CountyTenth Circuit· 2002-09-20· cited 1×
- Brazzle v. Washington CityD. Utah· 2013-09-30· cited 1×
- Croley v. JDM Servs., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-16· cited 1×
- Abdul-Hakim v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.D. Kansas· 2006-10-11
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 6,226×
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 5,248×
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 4,775×
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1998-05-18· cited 2,797×
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesTenth Circuit· 1999-01-25· cited 832×
- James L. Bolden, Jr. v. Prc Inc., Formerly Known as Planning Research Corporation, and Robert CarverTenth Circuit· 1995-01-31· cited 333×
- Lockard v. Pizza Hut, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1998-12-14· cited 202×
- Franks v. NimmoTenth Circuit· 1986-07-07· cited 144×
- Myron Durtsche, Jr. v. American Colloid CompanyTenth Circuit· 1992-04-03· cited 79×
- Martha Griffith v. State of Colorado, Division of Youth ServicesTenth Circuit· 1994-02-28· cited 72×
- Wilson v. Tulsa Junior CollegeTenth Circuit· 1998-12-31· cited 52×
- Harrison v. Eddy Potash, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1998-10-30· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.