Skip to main content
· 12/14/1998

Lockard v. Pizza Hut, Inc.

Citations

  • 162 F.3d 1062
  • 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 224
  • 163 A.L.R. Fed. 697
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 31198
  • 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,670
  • 78 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1026
  • 1998 WL 863978

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a single incident of physically threatening and humiliating conduct was sufficient to create a hostile work environment for a sexual harassment claim
  • holding that a single incident of physically threatening and humiliating conduct can be sufficient to create a hostile work environment for a sexual harassment claim
  • emphasizing that the manager “placed Ms. Lockard in an abusive and potentially dangerous situation, although he clearly had both the means and the authority to avoid doing so”
  • stating that \trend in Title VII cases appears to be in favor of adopting [single employer/integrated enterprise] test\ but noting Tenth Circuit has yet to adopt it
  • finding that a nursing home may be held liable for patient misconduct when the employer has the requisite knowledge and control over the situation and fails to take remedial action
  • discussing, among other things, 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(e), an EEOC guideline dealing with the known- or-should-have-known standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Porfilio, Henry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.