Hollinger v. Sifers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the stream of commerce theory can justify long-arm jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant engaged in providing a service, but holding that the contact requirements are more stringent when the basis for jurisdiction is a service rather than a product
• recognizing that the stream of commerce theory can justify long-arm jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant engaged in providing a service, but holding that the contact requirements are more stringent when the basis for jurisdiction is a service rather than a product
• “Where a nonresident defendant is engaged in providing a service, as opposed to providing a product through the stream of commerce, the contact requirements for long-arm jurisdiction are more stringent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).