Skip to main content
· 9/30/1997

Chromalloy American Corp. v. Elyria Foundry Co.

Citations

  • 955 S.W.2d 1
  • 1997 Mo. LEXIS 81
  • 1997 WL 623644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the foreign actor transacted business by “travelling] to Missouri intending to contact a Missouri corporation and propose the purchase of one of its assets”
  • recognizing exception to the “general rule” where the “dismissal has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the form cast”
  • recognizing exception to the “general rule” where the “dismissal has the practical effect of terminating the litigation in the form cast”
  • holding two trips to Missouri are “sufficient minimum contacts” for personal jurisdiction where the purpose of the trips was to initiate and further the purchase of a foundry from a Missouri corporation
  • re-offering the same rejected claims to support plaintiffs claim that business was transacted in Missouri as support for a new contention that a contract was formed in Missouri in regard to personal jurisdiction would be an exercise in futility
  • two trips to Missouri to negotiate and later review contract — although contract was formed in Ohio — constituted transaction of business and triggered Missouri’s long-arm statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.