Skip to main content
Tenth Circuit· 6/6/2016

Holland v. Allbaugh

Citations

  • 824 F.3d 1222
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 10187
  • 2016 WL 3145595

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “the Ninth Circuit has gone so far as to hold no clearly established Supreme Court law exists with respect to evidentiary [habeas] claims at all”
  • “We also note that the Ninth Circuit has gone so far as to hold no clearly established Supreme Court law exists with respect to evidentiary claims at all” (citing Holley v. Yarborough, 568 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2009)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tymkovich, Baldock, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Holland v. Allbaugh

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.