Holguin v. Twin Cities Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• avoiding a finding that the contract at issue lacked mutuality by “determin[ing] that the contract before us implies an obligation on Appellee’s part to provide the subject matter” of the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Conoco, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1999-04-01· cited 128×
• West v. Brenntag Southwest, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-07-20· cited 33×
• Lulirama Ltd. v. Axcess Broadcast Services, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-12-03· cited 12×
• Cindy's Candle Co., Inc. v. WNS, INC.
  N.D. Illinois· 1989-06-14· cited 3×
• Gerffert Co., Inc. v. William J. Hirten Co., LLC
  D. Rhode Island· 2011-09-07· cited 1×
• Lulirama Ltd., Inc. v. Axcess Broadcast Services, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1997-11-10
• Unnamed case
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2005-07-20
• Damus Bacon v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2008-04-03
• in Re: Enterprise Crude Oil, LLC
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2018-01-30