· 4/1/1999
Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Conoco, Inc.
Citations
- 986 S.W.2d 603
- 141 Oil & Gas Rep. 436
- 36 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 1011
- 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 75
- 1999 Tex. LEXIS 22
- 1998 WL 733053
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that the determination of good faith rested on whether the seller acted with “a valid business reason.”
- indicating that the determination of good faith rested on whether the seller acted with “a valid business reason.”
- declining to impose a duty of reasonableness in the parties’ contract because the contract did not provide an underlying obligation or duty
- refusing to imply obligation on gas seller to continue buying gas, because promise to sell gas if it bought any was surrender of legal right and thus sufficient consideration
- refusing to imply obligation on gas seller to continue buying gas, because promise to sell gas if it bought any was surrender of legal right and thus sufficient consideration
- “A party who seeks to avoid performance of an output contract by having no output . . . may not do so in bad faith.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Enoch, Phillips, Gonzalez, Hecht, Spector, Owen, Baker, Abbott, Hankinson, O'Neill, Gonzales
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.